Populismo, repertorios autoritarios y subversión de la democracia

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF
Publicado: ago 23, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2023.2NE.60980
Palabras clave:
populismo, repertorio autoritario, personalismo, democracia, autocratización
Insignia de Dimmensions

Contenido principal del artículo

Alejandro Monsiváis Carrillo
Departamento de Estudios de Administración Pública, Colegio de la Frontera Norte.

Resumen

Este artículo introduce el concepto de repertorio autoritario para dar cuenta de la forma en que el populismo amenaza a la democracia. El populismo es la idea de que la política está definida por el antagonismo moral entre el pueblo y las élites. Esta idea contribuye a subvertir la democracia cuando es utilizada por gobiernos encabezados por líderes personalistas que buscan ejercer el poder de forma ilimitada e irrestricta. La retórica populista le permite al ejecutivo desplegar un reportorio de acciones y estrategias que transgreden las normas democráticas y apuntalan la autocratización del régimen.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Monsiváis Carrillo, A. (2023). Populismo, repertorios autoritarios y subversión de la democracia. Revista Mexicana De Sociologí­a, 85(2° NE), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2023.2NE.60980
Número
Vol. 85 Núm. 2° NE (2023): Número Especial. Populismo y democracia
Sección
ARTÍCULOS
Licencia Creative Commons
Revista Mexicana de Sociología por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://revistamexicanadesociologia.unam.mx/index.php/rms/.
Biografía del autor/a

Alejandro Monsiváis Carrillo, Departamento de Estudios de Administración Pública, Colegio de la Frontera Norte.

Técnico Académico, adscrito al Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM. Responsable de la versión electrónica de la Revista Mexicana de Sociología.

Citas

Balderacchi, Claudio (2018). “Political leadership and the construction of competitive authoritarian regimes in Latin America: Implications and prospects for democracy”. Democratization 25 (3): 504-523. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1080/135103 47.2017.1388229.

Bermeo, Nancy (2016). “On democratic backsliding”. Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5-19. Disponible en https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012.

Bornschier, Simon (2019). “Populist success in Latin America and Western Europe: Ideational and party-system-centered explanations”. En The Ideational Approach to Populism, coordinado por Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan Carlin, Littvay Levente y Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 202-237. Nueva York: Routledge.

Borowiak, Craig (2011). Democracy and Accountability. The Pitfalls and Promise of Popular Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bruhn, Kathleen (2012). “ʽTo hell with your corrupt institutions!ʼ: amlo and populism in Mexico”. En Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, coordinado por Cas Mudde y Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 88-112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carrión, Julio F. (2022). A Dynamic Theory of Populism in Power: The Andes in Com¬parative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.1093/oso/9780197572290.001.0001.

Cassani, Andrea, y Luca Tomini (2019). “Post-Cold War autocratization: Trends and patterns of regime change opposite to democratization”. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 49 (2): 121-138. Disponible en https:// doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.4.

Castanho Silva, Bruno, Sebastian Jungkunz, Marc Helbling y Levente Littvay (2019). “An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales”. Political Research Quarterly 73 (2). Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176.

Chambers, Simone, y Jeffrey Kopstein (2022). “Wrecking the public sphere: The new authoritarians’ digital attack on pluralism and truth”. Constellations. Disponible en https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12620.

Curato, Nicole, y Diego Fossati (2020). “Authoritarian innovations: Crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia”. Democratization 27 (6): 1006-1020. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1777985.

Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. Yale: Yale University Press.

Della Porta, Donatella (2013). “Repertoires of contention”. En The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, coordinado por Donatella Della Porta. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm178.

Doyle, David (2011). “The legitimacy of political institutions: Explaining contemporary populism in Latin America”. Comparative Political Studies 44 (11): 1447-1473. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407469.

Eisenstadt, Todd A. (2007). “The origins and rationality of the ʽLegal versus Le¬gitimateʼ dichotomy invoked in Mexico’s 2006 post-electoral conflict”. PS: Political Science & Politics 1 (40): 39-43. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1049096507070072.

Feres Júnior, João, Fernanda Cavassana y Juliana Gagliardi (2023). “Is Jair Bolsonaro a classic populist?” Globalizations 20 (1): 60-75. Disponible en https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14747731.2022.2111827.

Gidron, Noam, y Peter A. Hall (2020). “Populism as a problem of social integration”. Comparative Political Studies 53 (7): 1027-1059. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.1177/0010414019879947.

Guasti, Petra (2020). “Populism in power and democracy: Democratic decay and resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020)”. Politics and Governance 8 (4): 473-484. Disponible en https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420.

Haggard, Stephan, y Robert Kaufman (2021). Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108957809.

Hameleers, Michael (2022). “Disinformation as a context-bound phenomenon: Toward a conceptual clarification integrating actors, intentions and techniques of creation and dissemination”. Communication Theory. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1093/ ct/qtac021.

Hawkins, Kirk A. (2009). “Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in com¬parative perspective”. Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040-1067. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.

Hawkins, Kirk A., y Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2017). “The ideational approach to populism”. Latin American Research Review 52 (4): 513-528. Disponible en https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.25222/larr.85.

Hawkins, Kirk A., y Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2019). “Introduction”. En The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, coordinado por Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan Carlin, Littvay Levente y Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 1-24. Nueva York: Routledge.

Hellmeier, Sebastian, Rowan Cole, Sandra Grahn, Palina Kolvani, Jean Lachapelle, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Shreeya Pillai y Staffan I. Lindberg (2021). “State of the world 2020: Autocratization turns viral”. Democratization 28 (6): 1053-1074. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1922390.

Hernández, César (2022). “La Suprema Corte y el fin del austericidio institucional”. Nexos. Disponible en https://eljuegodelacorte.nexos.com.mx/la-suprema-cor¬te-y-el-fin-del-austericidio-institucional/.

Hunger, Sophia, y Fred Paxton (2021). “What’s in a buzzword? A systematic review of the state of populism research in political science”. Political Science Research and Methods 1-17. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44.

Inglehart, Ronald, y Pippa Norris (2017). “Trump and the populist authoritarian par¬ties: The silent revolution in reverse”. Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 443-454. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000111.

Juon, Andreas, y Daniel Bochsler (2020). “Hurricane or fresh breeze? Disentangling the populist effect on the quality of democracy”. European Political Science Review 12 (3): 391-408. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000259.

Laclau, Ernesto (2005). On Populist Reason. Londres/Nueva York: Verso.

Levitsky, Steven, y James Loxton (2013). “Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes”. Democratization 20 (1): 107-136. Disponible en https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738864.

Lührmann, Anna, y Staffan I. Lindberg, (2019). “A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization 26 (7): 1095-1113. Disponible en https:// doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.

Lührmann, Anna, Marcus Tannenberg y Staffan Lindberg (2018). “Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes”. Politics and Governance 6 (1): 60-77. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1214.

Maerz, Seraphine F., y Carsten Q. Schneider (2021). “Public discourse and autocrati¬zation: Infringing on autonomy, sabotaging accountability”. V-Dem Working Paper 112. Disponible en https://ssrn.com/abstract=3779244.

Mainwaring, Scott, y Aníbal Pérez Liñan (2023). “Why Latin Americaʼs democracies are stuck”. Jornal of Democracy 34 (1): 156-170.

Mansbridge, Jane, y Stephen Macedo (2019). “Populism and democratic theory”. An¬nual Review of Law and Social Science 15 (1): 59-77. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843.

McCoy, Jennifer, Tahmina Rahman y Murat Somer (2018). “Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities”. American Behavioral Scientist 62 (1): 16-42. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576.

México Evalúa (2022). “Se estrecha el cerco fiscal al ine”. Números de Erario. Disponible en https://numerosdeerario.mexicoevalua.org/2022/11/11/se-estrecha-el-cerco-fiscal-al-ine-3t-2022/.

Moffitt, Benjamin, y Simon Tormey (2014). “Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisa¬tion and political style”. Political Studies 62 (2): 381-397. Disponible en https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032.

Monsiváis Carrillo, Alejandro (2020). “La izquierda populista en México: ¿amenaza o correctivo para la democracia?” En Las izquierdas mexicanas hoy. Las vertientes de la izquierda, coordinado por Jorge Cadena-Roa y Miguel A. López Leyva, 39-78. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales-Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades/ Ficticia. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2SFzPik.

Monsiváis Carrillo, Alejandro (2022). “Happy winners, sore partisans? Political trust, partisanship, and the populist assault on electoral integrity in Mexico”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 15 (1): 72-95. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.1177/1866802x221136147.

Monsiváis Carrillo, Alejandro (2023). “Populismo, desinformación e integridad elec¬toral en México”. Revista Elecciones 22 (25): 151-182. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.53557/elecciones.2023.v22n25.05.

Mudde, Cas (2004). “The populist Zeitgeist”. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542-563.

Mudde, Cas, y Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2018). “Studying populism in compa¬rative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda”. Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667-1693. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.1177/0010414018789490.

Munck, Gerardo (2016). “What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy”. Democratization 23 (1): 1-26. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.108 0/13510347.2014.918104.

Ochoa Espejo, Paulina (2017). “Populism and the idea of the people”. En The Oxford Handbook of Populism, coordinado por Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo y Pierre Ostiguy, 607-628. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.30.

Panizza, Francisco (2005). “Introduction. Populism and the mirror of democracy”. En Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, coordinado por Francisco Panizza, 1-31. Londres: Verso.

Pappas, Takis S. (2019). Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.1093/oso/9780198837886.001.0001.

Peters, Guy B., y Jon Pierre (2019). “Populism and public administration: Confronting the administrative state”. Administration & Society 51 (10): 1521-1545. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719874749.

Pettit, Phillip (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of De¬mocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Przeworski, Adam (2010). Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, y Raúl L. Madrid (2020). “The perils of personalism”. De-mocratization 27 (2): 321-339. Disponible en https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1080/13510347.2019.1696310.

Rico, Guillem, Marc Guinjoan y Eva Anduiza (2017). “The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes”. Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 444-461. Disponible en https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ spsr.12261.

Rooduijn, Matthijs, y Tjitske Akkerman (2017). “Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe”. Party Politics 23 (3): 193-204. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514.

Rosanvallon, Pierre (2020). El siglo del populismo. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.

Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal (2012). “The ambivalence of populism: Threat and co¬rrective for democracy”. Democratization 19 (2): 184-208. Disponible en https:// doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572619.

Rummens, Stefan (2017). “Populism as a threat to liberal democracy”. En The Oxford Handbook of Populism, coordinado por Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo y Pierre Ostiguy, 554-570. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.27.

Ruth-Lovell, Saskia Pauline, y Sandra Grahn (2022). “Threat or corrective to demo¬cracy? The relationship between populism and different models of democracy” European Journal of Political Research. Disponible en https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1111/1475-6765.12564.

Schedler, Andreas (2010). “Inconsistencias contaminantes: gobernación electoral y conflicto poselectoral en las elecciones presidenciales del 2006 en México”. América Latina Hoy 51: 41-60. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.6933.

Schedler, Andreas (2019). “The breaching experiment. Donald Trump and the norma¬tive foundations of democracy”. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 13 (4): 433-460. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-019-00438-0.

Schmidt, Vivien A. (2022). “The discursive construction of discontent: Varieties of populist anti-system ideas and discursive interactions in Europe”. Journal of Eu¬ropean Integration 44 (2) 165-182. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1080/07036 337.2022.2032019.

Tilly, Charles (2008). Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804366.

Urbinati, Nadia (2019a). Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cam-bridge/Londres: Harvard University Press.

Urbinati, Nadia (2019b). “Political theory of populism”. Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 111-127. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci- 050317-070753.

V-Dem (2022). Democracy Report 2023: Defiance in the Face of Autocratization. Universidad de Gothenburg/V-Dem Institute. Disponible en https://v-dem.net/ media/publications/dr_2022.pdf.

Warren, Mark (2014). “Accountability and democracy”. En The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, coordinado por Mark Bovens, Robert Goodin y Thomas Schillemans, 39-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weyland, Kurt (2001). “Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics”. Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1-22. Disponible en https://doi. org/10.2307/422412.

Weyland, Kurt (2013). “The threat from the populist left”. Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 18-32.

Weyland, Kurt (2017). “Populism: A political-strategic approach”. En The Oxford Handbook of Populism, coordinado por Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo y Pierre Ostiguy, 48-72. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2.

Weyland, Kurt (2020). “Populism’s threat to democracy: Comparative lessons for the United States”. Perspectives on Politics 18 (2): 389-406. Disponible en https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719003955.